Structural and computational design of a SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen with improved expression and immunogenicity.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern challenge the efficacy of approved vaccines, emphasizing the need for updated spike antigens. Here, we use an evolutionary-based design aimed at boosting protein expression levels of S-2P and improving immunogenic outcomes in mice. Thirty-six prototype antigens were generated in silico and 15 were produced for biochemical analysis. S2D14, which contains 20 computationally designed mutations within the S2 domain and a rationally engineered D614G mutation in the SD2 domain, has an ~11-fold increase in protein yield and retains RBD antigenicity. Cryo-electron microscopy structures reveal a mixture of populations in various RBD conformational states. Vaccination of mice with adjuvanted S2D14 elicited higher cross-neutralizing antibody titers than adjuvanted S-2P against the SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan strain and four variants of concern. S2D14 may be a useful scaffold or tool for the design of future coronavirus vaccines, and the approaches used for the design of S2D14 may be broadly applicable to streamline vaccine discovery.

Influenza A(H7N9) Pandemic Preparedness: Assessment of the Breadth of Heterologous Antibody Responses to Emerging Viruses from Multiple Pre-Pandemic Vaccines and Population Immunity.

Influenza A(H7N9) viruses remain as a high pandemic threat. The continued evolution of the A(H7N9) viruses poses major challenges in pandemic preparedness strategies through vaccination. We assessed the breadth of the heterologous neutralizing antibody responses against the 3rd and 5th wave A(H7N9) viruses using the 1st wave vaccine sera from 4 vaccine groups: 1. inactivated vaccine with 2.8 µg hemagglutinin (HA)/dose + AS03A; 2. inactivated vaccine with 5.75 µg HA/dose + AS03A; 3. inactivated vaccine with 11.5 µg HA/dose + MF59; and 4. recombinant virus like particle (VLP) vaccine with 15 µg HA/dose + ISCOMATRIX™. Vaccine group 1 had the highest antibody responses to the vaccine virus and the 3rd/5th wave drifted viruses. Notably, the relative levels of cross-reactivity to the drifted viruses as measured by the antibody GMT ratios to the 5th wave viruses were similar across all 4 vaccine groups. The 1st wave vaccines induced robust responses to the 3rd and Pearl River Delta lineage 5th wave viruses but lower cross-reactivity to the highly pathogenic 5th wave A(H7N9) virus. The population in the United States was largely immunologically naive to the A(H7N9) HA. Seasonal vaccination induced cross-reactive neuraminidase inhibition and binding antibodies to N9, but minimal cross-reactive antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) antibodies to A(H7N9).

Reactogenicity, safety, and immunogenicity of chimeric haemagglutinin influenza split-virion vaccines, adjuvanted with AS01 or AS03 or non-adjuvanted: a phase 1-2 randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: One strategy to develop a universal influenza virus vaccine is to redirect the immune system to the highly conserved haemagglutinin stalk domain by sequentially administering vaccines expressing chimeric (c) haemagglutinins with a conserved stalk domain and divergent head domain, to which humans are naive. We aimed to assess the reactogenicity, safety, and immunogenicity of adjuvanted and unadjuvanted investigational supra-seasonal universal influenza virus vaccines (SUIVs) in healthy young adults. METHODS: In this observer-masked, randomised, controlled, phase 1-2 trial, we recruited adults aged 18-39 years with no clinically significant conditions from six centres in Belgium and the USA. Participants were randomly assigned to ten equally sized groups via an online system with the MATerial Excellence programme. Vaccines contained heterosubtypic group 1 H8, H5, or H11 haemagglutinin heads, an H1 haemagglutinin stalk, and an N1 neuraminidase (cH8/1N1, cH5/1N1, and cH11/1N1; haemagglutinin dose 15 µg/0·5 mL), administered on days 1 and 57, with a month 14 booster. SUIVs were evaluated in the sequences: cH8/1N1-placebo-cH5/1N1, cH5/1N1-placebo-cH8/1N1, or cH8/1N1-cH5/1N1-cH11/1N1, adjuvanted with either AS03 or AS01, or not adjuvanted. The last group received inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (IIV4)-placebo-IIV4. Primary outcomes were safety (analysed in the exposed population) and immunogenicity in terms of the anti-H1 stalk humoral response at 28 days after vaccination (analysed in the per-protocol population, defined as participants who received the study vaccines according to the protocol). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03275389. FINDINGS: Between Sept 25, 2017, and March 26, 2020, 507 eligible participants were enrolled. 468 (92%) participants received at least one dose of study vaccine (exposed population), of whom 244 (52%) were included in the per-protocol population at final analysis at month 26. The safety profiles of all chimeric vaccines were clinically acceptable, with no safety concerns identified. Injection-site pain was the most common adverse event, occurring in 84-96% of participants receiving an adjuvanted SUIV or non-adjuvanted IIV4 and in 40-50% of participants receiving a non-adjuvanted SUIV. Spontaneously reported adverse events up to 28 days after vaccination occurred in 36-60% of participants, with no trends observed for any group. 17 participants had a serious adverse event, none of which were considered to be causally related to the vaccine. Anti-H1 stalk antibody titres were highest in AS03-adjuvanted groups, followed by AS01-adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted groups, and were higher after cH8/1N1 than after cH5/1N1 and after a two-dose primary schedule than after a one-dose schedule. Geometric mean concentrations by ELISA ranged from 21 938·1 ELISA units/mL (95% CI 18 037·8-26 681·8) in the IIV4-placebo-IIV4 group to 116 596·8 ELISA units/mL (93 869·6-144 826·6) in the AS03-adjuvanted cH8/1N1-cH5/1N1-cH11/1N1 group 28 days after the first dose and from 15 105·9 ELISA units/mL (12 007·7-19 003·6) in the non-adjuvanted cH5/1N1-placebo-cH8/1N1 group to 74 639·7 ELISA units/mL (59 986·3-92 872·6) in the AS03-adjuvanted cH8/1N1-cH5/1N1-cH11/1N1 group 28 days after the second dose. INTERPRETATION: The stalk domain seems to be a rational target for development of a universal influenza virus vaccine via administration of chimeric haemagglutinins with head domains to which humans are naive. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals.

A self-amplifying mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate induces safe and robust protective immunity in preclinical models.

RNA vaccines have demonstrated efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 in humans, and the technology is being leveraged for rapid emergency response. In this report, we assessed immunogenicity and, for the first time, toxicity, biodistribution, and protective efficacy in preclinical models of a two-dose self-amplifying messenger RNA (SAM) vaccine, encoding a prefusion-stabilized spike antigen of SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan-Hu-1 strain and delivered by lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). In mice, one immunization with the SAM vaccine elicited a robust spike-specific antibody response, which was further boosted by a second immunization, and effectively neutralized the matched SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan strain as well as B.1.1.7 (Alpha), B.1.351 (Beta) and B.1.617.2 (Delta) variants. High frequencies of spike-specific germinal center B, Th0/Th1 CD4, and CD8 T cell responses were observed in mice. Local tolerance, potential systemic toxicity, and biodistribution of the vaccine were characterized in rats. In hamsters, the vaccine candidate was well-tolerated, markedly reduced viral load in the upper and lower airways, and protected animals against disease in a dose-dependent manner, with no evidence of disease enhancement following SARS-CoV-2 challenge. Therefore, the SARS-CoV-2 SAM (LNP) vaccine candidate has a favorable safety profile, elicits robust protective immune responses against multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants, and has been advanced to phase 1 clinical evaluation (NCT04758962).

Technological approaches to streamline vaccination schedules, progressing towards single-dose vaccines.

Vaccines represent the most successful medical intervention in history, with billions of lives saved. Although multiple doses of the same vaccine are typically required to reach an adequate level of protection, it would be advantageous to develop vaccines that induce protective immunity with fewer doses, ideally just one. Single-dose vaccines would be ideal to maximize vaccination coverage, help stakeholders to greatly reduce the costs associated with vaccination, and improve patient convenience. Here we describe past attempts to develop potent single dose vaccines and explore the reasons they failed. Then, we review key immunological mechanisms of the vaccine-specific immune responses, and how innovative technologies and approaches are guiding the preclinical and clinical development of potent single-dose vaccines. By modulating the spatio-temporal delivery of the vaccine components, by providing the appropriate stimuli to the innate immunity, and by designing better antigens, the new technologies and approaches leverage our current knowledge of the immune system and may synergize to enable the rational design of next-generation vaccination strategies. This review provides a rational perspective on the possible development of future single-dose vaccines.